Heathrow has now submitted its latest plan for the expansion,which would divert part of the M25 motorway (Picture: Heathrow Airport)
The race for the controversial Heathrow expansion has geared up after two rival plans are now on the table.
First up were plans by billionaire businessman Surinder Arora’s company,the Arora Group,which revealed cheaper plans with a shorter new runway.
Now Heathrow has submitted its plan for the third runway,which would be full length and take a chunk out of the M25 nearby.
Heathrow has said its plan is ‘shovel-ready’ and flights could take off within a decade.
The new runway could add 276,000 more flights each year,increasing the number from 480,000 to 756,000 annually.
The expansion would create at least 30 new daily routes and serve up to 150 million passengers,Heathrow said.
A map shows where the new terminal complex T5X,consisting of terminals called T5XN and T5XW terminals,and the third runway would be built if Heathrow’s plan is chosen (Picture: Heathrow)
Here is a breakdown of the £49 billion price tag.
£21 billion -Used to build the new,full-length,11,482ft runway north-west of the current airport,and to divert part of the M25 into a tunnel
£12 billion – This will fund the new terminal complex called T5X to allow the increased passenger numbers,baggage handling,airside and landside operations,car parks and transport connections
£15 billion – The current airport buildings and services will be upgraded at Terminal 2,including two satellite piers,while the old Terminal 3 and Terminal 1 will be demolished
The third runway will swallow up parts of Harmondsworth in Hillingdon north of the airport,an area dotted with hundreds of homes,a primary school,pubs and a moor.
Part of the M25 will be diverted into a tunnel to cut underneath the runway.
Many locals are against the expansion as homes and businesses near the airport’s safety perimeter face demolition,with up to 700 buildings at risk.
To get the latest news from the capital visit Metro's London news hub.
This aerial CGI visual shows where the third runway would be built above the existing north runway and across the M25 (Picture: Heathrow Airport)
The UK’s busiest airport has been driving for the expansion for years as bosses have argued that Heathrow’s capacity is full.
Heathrow’s CEO,Thomas Woldbye,said operating at capacity at the moment is ‘to the detriment of trade and connectivity.’
He said: ‘With a green light from government and the correct policy support underpinned by a fit-for-purpose,regulatory model,we are ready to mobilise and start investing this year in our supply chain across the country.’
The Chancellor said the move will help boost UK economic growth,but campaigners have said the expansion will result in more aircraft noise and pollution,and groups have been up in arms about the expansion idea since it wa first introduced in 2009.
A CGI visual shows the new third Heathrow runway on the left with the M25 diverted underneath it (Picture: Heathrow Airport)
Greenpeace UK said the expansion will support a small number of flyers while ‘the rest of us have to live with the consequences of their disproportionate polluting.’
Justine Bayley,the chair of Stop Heathrow Expansion and a local resident,told Metro that the government failed to give any of the ‘downsides,’ adding that the Chancellor gave ‘fairly meaningless assurances that all environmental aspects will be met.’
She said she has seen ‘all sort of threats coming and going’ during her 30 years of living in the village and that the residents would continue their fight against the expansion.
Ms Bayley said the country has ‘managed a fair bit of growth without the additional runway.’
‘It is not a magic wand for growth,’ she said.
United News - unews.co.za